Bob Lazar's Gravity Generators
The following is the rubber sheet explanation of space-time manipulation by Bob Lazar. 1
"Assuming they're in space, they will focus the three gravity generators
on the point they want to go to. Now, to give an analogy: If you take a thin rubber sheet, say, lay it on a table and put thumbtacks in each corner, then take a big stone and set it on one end of the rubber sheet and say that's your spacecraft, you pick out a point that you want to go to - which could be anywhere on the rubber sheet - pinch that point with your fingers and pull it all the way up to the craft. That's how it focuses and pulls that point to it. When you then shut off the gravity generator[s], the stone (or spacecraft) follows that stretched rubber back to its point. There's no linear travel through space; it actually bends space and time and follows space as it retracts. In the first mode of travel - around the surface of a planet - they essentially balance on the gravitational field that the gravity generators put out, and they can ride a "wave", like a cork does in the ocean. In that mode they're very unstable and are affected by the weather. In the other mode of travel - where they can travel vast distances - they can't really do that in a strong gravitational field like Earth, because to do that, first of all, they need to tilt on their side, usually out in space, then they can focus on the point they need to with the gravity generators and move on. If you can picture space as a fabric, and the speed of light is your limit, it'll take you so long, even at the speed of light, to get from point A to point B.
You can't exceed it - not in this universe anyway. Should there be other parallel universes, maybe the laws are different, but anyone that's here has to abide by those rules.
"Inside the reactor, Element 115 is bombarded with a proton which plugs into the nucleus of the 115 atom and becomes Element 116, which immediately decays and releases, or radiates, small amounts of antimatter.
The antimatter is released into a tuned tube which keeps it from reacting with the matter that surrounds it. It is then directed toward a gaseous matter target at the end of the tube.
The matter and antimatter collide and annihilate, totally converting to energy. The heat from this reaction is converted into electrical energy in a near 100% efficient thermoelectric generator..." 1
Element 115 is a superheavy element found probably on a planet of a binary star system. Supposedly the craft uses 223 grams, cut to a triangular shape, within the reactor structure, (in a cloud chamber it was shown to alter, by gravitational forces, the paths of released alpha particles)." 1
My comment here is what happens beyond the 'gaseous matter target' - what sort of energy field is established, is it an electric field (if so what polarity), or is it an electromagnetic wave propagation, or is it a gravitational wave that is being produced...
The thing about Lazar's central tube assembly, which he doesn't make mention of, is that it surely must be used as a circular cross-section waveguide for high-frequency waves. From his graphics it looks like an 8cm tube and that would relate to an electromagnetic wave in the microwave region (especially if the tube terminated at the top at a smaller diameter). And whatever the target is, hitting it with these microwaves most probably causes the molecules and atoms of the target 'gases' to resonate (as in electron spin resonance), the resonance then pulls the electrons up the energy bands and greatly increases their energy level.
My next comment is that, according to Bob Lazar, speaking about one of the propulsion systems used by the ufo he worked on, "the craft does not create an 'antigravity field', as some have surmised: It's a gravitational field that's out of phase with the current one - it's the same gravitational wave. The phases vary from 180 degrees to zero...in a longitudinal propagation." 1
So if, by analogy, we assume that the gravitational wave is similarly structured to that of a sinusoidal electromagnetic wave (there is some evidence to suggest that gravity waves are structured as an electromagnetic wave). What Bob Lazar seems to be saying is that by duplicating exactly this wave, and then propagating this duplicated wave back into the original, after altering its phase (so that - in relation to the existing gravity wave 'force' that is operating throughout this planet - the newly created wave matches it or differs from it) then the newly created gravity force can be made stronger or weaker than the existing one...
OK... Is he saying that if you created the same current-magnetic field combination for the gravity wave (at the same amplitude) but altered the phase, to say 89º, you would become heavier and at 180º you would be lighter...?
Sounds interesting. He's talking about selective constructive and destructive interference between two radiating waves... (as seen in Radio Wave Controlled Electric Field Drive System by Mike Competillo). His system is for dual gravitational waves.
One more comment, because it's been puzzling me ever since I clapped eyes on his drawings, is that the 'gravity wave generators' radiate some sort of energy beam below the craft THROUGH THE SHELL CASING. Now call me old-fashioned but on this speck of the universe engineers just don't do that sort of thing... Having said that however *, if the shell was constructed not of plain metal but of an 'artificial' metal (of an artificial metallized dielectric composition), and the electromagnetic waves being used were of small enough wavelength, radio waves of microwave length being particularly suitable, then just as Lazar has implied THE HULL OF THE CRAFT COULD BE USED AS A LENS for focusing the electromagnetic waves. Because with radio waves of very short wavelength it has long been established that they behave somewhat like lightwaves, in that they have what is termed "optical properties" meaning that these waves can be bent or flattened by a suitably constructed 'lens'. Such a lens for a radio micro-wave is made not of glass but of metallized plates inter-spaced certain distances apart, which in this case would equate to around 10 - 50 mm apart. In this way the hull could be used as a very efficient waveguide, not merely to focus the beams but more advantageously to regulate their shape or to give a predetermined delay between one beam and another.
[ * Well actually they do do that sort of thing... the idea of making artificial or metallic dielectrics was first announced in 1946, see "Metal-Lens Antennas" by W. E. Kock in Proc. IRE (Nov 1946) vol 34 p828-836; "Path-Length Microwave Lenses" by W. E. Kock in Proc. IRE (Aug 1949) vol 37 p852-855; and "Metallic Delay Lens" by W. E. Kock in Bell System Tech J. (Jan 1948) vol 27 p58-82. Also see "Antennas" by John D. Kraus (1988) ch.14 Lens Antennas p661-691].
This is how it could be done; whereas normal dielectrics have microscopic particles and interfaces, the 'artificial dielectric' can be made to have metal strips (or rods or spheres) of macro-scopic size constructed into it in the form of a lattice. With this technique comes the added advantage that the strips or particles can be aligned to the orientation of the required electric fields. Of the two main types of structured 'metallic lens' the M-plane alignment retards the em wave, and the E-plane alignment accelerates the wave (in the E-plane structure the metal strips are parallel to the plane of the electric field of the wave - as shown in fig.4 above). Further, if the spacing between these parallel strips or plates is exactly one-half wavelength the wave is greatly accelerated. A honeycomb structure in the artificial 'metal' would be ideal for this purpose.
If you look at the graphic (fig.5) above you will see three sections of the bottom of the hull especially curved, and each of these curved sections because they are differently spaced from the wave generators have a different "focal length" (to use a photographic term), and because at different focal lengths the wave's shape will be different as it enters the dielectric waveguide lens then the resultant wave produced by that lens-waveguide when that wave passes through it will also be different. Couple to this the fact that for every different angle that the waves pass through the dielectric hull a different effect of refraction will occur to the wave. Consider next that if this craft uses the two outer generators to focus their two microwave-beams at some finite point in the distance it would follow that to approach that same point in space the two beams will have traversed through a different thickness of the dielectric lens, and at a different angle, meaning that the two beams will be shaped slightly differently. If, then, it can be controlled how the two waves are shaped then it will also be possible to control their constructive and destructive interference pattern - and hence the strength or weakness of the electric field at the area where the two beams approach eachother. And as you already know the stronger the electric field the stronger the repulsion - the stronger the acceleration.
Well then, Bob Lazar knows his stuff.
1 The above Bob Lazar quotes are taken from "Alien Contact" by Timothy Good (1993) p183 and p181 respectively - (for more detailed information see Bob Lazar's Reactor and Microwave Analogy webpages) - but I must say, I don't think his website's "discussion" section is in working order - which is a shame.
Return to Electrokinetic UFO page
Return to UFO Propagation